Why an organization should review its health
and safety performance
The primary purpose of measuring health and safety performance is to provide
information on the progress and current status of the strategies, processes and
activities used by an organization to control risks to health and safety.
Measurement is an accepted a part
of the ‘plan-do-check-act’ management method.
Measuring performance is the
maximum extent a part of a health and safety management system as regulatory, manufacture
or service delivery management.
The framework for managing health
and safety, illustrated in Figure below, shows where measuring performance fits
within the overall health and safety management system.
Providing information
The main purpose of evaluating
health and safety performance is to provide information on the improvement and the existing position of the policies, processes, and events used by an organization
to control risks to health and safety.
Measurement info sustains the
operation and development of the health and safety management system, and so
the control of risk, by:
- providing info on however the system operates in practice;
- Identifying areas where remedial action is required;
- Providing a basis for continual improvement; and
- Providing feedback and motivation.
Effective performance measurement
delivers information on both the level of enactment and why the performance the level is as it is. ‘Only when you know why you have hit the objective can you
truly say you have learned archery If the information derived from measurement
cannot be used as a resource to recognize the basis of performance then it is
of no use.
Answering queries
Health and safety performance mensuration
ought to hunt for to answer such queries as
·
- Where are we now in controlling hazards and risks?
- Why are we where we are?
- Are we getting better or worse over time?
- Is our management of health and safety actual (doing the right things)?
- Is our management of health and safety consistent (doing things right consistently)?
- Is our management of health and safety balanced to our hazards and risks?
- Is our management of health and safety well-organized?
- Is a good health and safety management system in situ across all elements of the organization (deployment)?
- Is our culture helpful in health and safety, particularly in the face of challenging demands?
These queries ought to be asked
not solely at the very best level however additionally at the assorted
management levels and across the organization.
The purpose should be to provide a complete picture of the organization’s health and safety performance.
Decision Factor:
•
wherever you're relative to wherever you would
like to be;
•
what progress is important and cheap within the
circumstances;
•
How that progress might be achieved against
particular limitations (e.g. resources or time);
•
the way progress might be achieved; and
•
priorities and effective use of resources.
Addressing completely different
info wants info from health and safety performance mensuration is required by
the individuals within the organization UN agency have explicit
accountabilities at intervals the health and safety management system.
These will include directors,
senior managers, line managers, supervisors, health and safety professionals
and employees/safety representatives.
They every want info applicable to
their position and responsibilities at intervals the health and safety
management system.
For example, what the CEO of a multinational organization needs to know from the performance measurement the system will differ in detail and nature from the manager of a particular
location.
And this may vary in detail from a
departmental manager in that location. There needs to be overall reason in a method so that individual measuring activities are aligned within the overall
performance measurement framework. In effect, this results in a categorized set
of linked measures that replicate the organization’s structure.
Because performance measures ought
to be derived primarily to satisfy an inside need, there will be a limit to the number which can be used meaningfully from organization to organization
(I.e. for external benchmarking
purposes) instead of at intervals the context of a specific organization.
‘Each organization should produce
and communicate performance measures that replicate its distinctive strategy’ -
Kaplan though the first focus for performance mensuration is to satisfy the
interior wants of
The organization, there is an
increasing need to establish to external stakeholders (regulators, insurance
companies, shareholders, suppliers, contractors, members of the public, etc.) that arrangement to control health and safety
Risks are in place, operating
correctly and effectively.
While the upper hazard industries
could have recognized that they need in result been granted ‘license to
operate’ by their area people and society, pressure for accountability is
reaching
Other sectors through routes like
company social responsibility.
The challenge for organizations is
to speak their performance in ways that} which square measure meaningful to
their numerous stakeholders.
Measures that can be used to monitor an
organizations health and safety performance
Active
Active
Inspections of equipment & premises
Tours of the workplace
Surveys eg noise
Work observation
Audits
Benchmarking
Responsive
Accident/ill-health statistics
Civil claims and insurance premiums
enforcing agency enforcement
Accident and sickness investigation
below follows but not limited to four proactive monitoring methods that can be used in assessing the health and safety performance of an organization.
Inspections of equipment & premises e.g. safety representative inspections, load testing
Tours of the workplace management examination of the workplace
Surveys eg, noise, illumination
Work observation scheduled observation to assess employee compliance with procedures
Audits to assess whether the system exists, is adequate and is used
0 Comments
Please do not enter spam link in the comment box.